This book explores how different publics make sense of and evaluate anti-terrorism powers within the UK, and the implications of this for citizenship and security. Drawing on primary empirical research, the book argues that whilst white individuals are not unconcerned about the effects of anti-terrorism, ethnic minority citizens (including, but not only those identifying as Muslim) believe that anti-terrorism powers have impacted negatively on their citizenship and security. This book thus offers the first systematic engagement with vernacular or everyday understandings of anti-terrorism policy, citizenship and security. It argues that while transformations in anti-terrorism frameworks impact on public experiences of security and citizenship, they do not do so in a uniform, homogeneous, or predictable manner. At the same time, public understandings and expectations of security and citizenship themselves shape how developments in anti-terrorism frameworks are discussed and evaluated. This important new book will be of interest to researchers and students working in a wide range of disciplines including Political Science, International Relations, Security Studies and Sociology.

Michael Lister is Reader in Politics at Oxford Brookes University

Introduction1. Anti-terrorism policy in the UK: historical trends and contemporary issues2. Citizenship and security3. Framing and evaluating anti-terrorism policy4. The impacts of anti-terrorism on citizenship5. Less, more, or otherwise (in)secure? Anti-terrorism powers and vernacular (in)securities6. Framing the security/anti-terrorism nexusConclusionBibliographyIndex