During every election cycle, political observers generate a seemingly limitless supply of theories, opinions, and predictions. Unfortunately, many of these assertions oversimplify complex subjects or overhype the latest political fads. Inevitably, some misinformation becomes part of the conventional wisdom about American elections. The objective ofConventional Wisdom and American Elections: Exploding Myths, Exploring Misconceptionsis to bring clarity to several of these subjects.For example, it is now commonplace for commentators to emphasize the negative tactics and practices of the campaigns of presidential candidates. In 2016, some commentators suggested that the presidential campaign was the nastiest ever, with the campaigns of President Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton, and their supporters, going to new extremes of negativity. However, these claims are not new. Dating as far back as the presidential election of 1800, critics of Thomas Jefferson stated that his potential victory would bring about legal prostitution and the burning of the Bible. In 1824, opponents of Andrew Jackson charged that he was a murderer and that his wife was a bigamist. Perhaps most scurrilous of all, Jacksons opponents even accused his dead mother of being a prostitute.In total,Conventional Wisdom and American Elections identifies eleven widely held myths and misconceptions about elections in the United States. The conclusions drawn throughout the book are based on the most current political science research. In some instances, the literature is clear in debunking popular myths about American elections. On other issues, research findings are more mixed. In either case,Conventional Wisdom and American Elections clarifies the issues so that readers can discern between those in which scholars have largely resolved and those in which honest debate remains.

Dr. Jody C Baumgartneris the Thomas Harriot College of Arts and Sciences Distinguished Professor of Political Science at East Carolina University. He has numerous books, authored and edited, to his credit. In 2017, he editedThe Internet and the 2016 Presidential Campaign with Terri Towner, and in 2018,Political Humor in a Changing Media Landscape: A New Generation of Research with Amy Becker. He has also written or collaborated on numerous articles and book chapters on political humor, the vice presidency, and other subjects.Dr. Peter L. Franciais the Thomas Harriot College of Arts and Sciences Director of the Center for Survey Research and is professor in the Department of Political Science at East Carolina University. He is the author of numerous academic publications on various topics related to American elections. His books includeThe Financiers of Congressional Elections:Investors, Ideologues, and Intimates, co-authored with John C. Green, Paul S. Herrnson, Lynda W. Powell, and Clyde Wilcox;The Future of Organized Labor in American Politics; and the volume,Guide to Interest Groups and Lobbying in the United States, co-edited with Burdett A. Loomis and Dara Z. Strolovitch. Dr. Francias insights on American politics have been included in the press accounts of national media outlets including CNN, National Public Radio, and theWall Street Journal.

List of IllustrationsIntroductionChapter 1. The Independent and Swing Voter Myth v. the Reality of Mobilizing the BaseChapter 2. To Vote or Not to Vote: Three Myths about Voter TurnoutChapter 3. End of the Two Party System? The Myth of the Rise of Third PartiesChapter 4. Buying Elections? Campaign Finance Law and Moneys Influence in Elections and PoliticsChapter 5. The Veepstakes: Balancing the Ticket and Other Myths about Vice Presidential SelectionChapter 6. Mudslinging 101: Have Presidential Campaigns Really Become Nastier?Chapter 7. Where Have You Gone, Walter Cronkite? The News Just Aint What It Used To BeChapter 8. Game Changer? Misconceptions about the Significance of Presidential DebatesChapter 9. Science or Voodoo? Misconceptions about National Election PollsChapter 10. May the Best Man Win? The Illusion of Competitive Congressional ElectionsChapter 11. The American People Have SpokenOr Have They? The Myth of the Presidential MandateIndexAbout the Authors