Marx's masterpieceCapital(Das Kapital) ignored or misread as well as selectively and creatively interpreted by the generation of social scientists that came after him. Emile Durkheim, Max Weber, and Georg Simmel attempt to supplement what they call historical materialism or to engage in debates about socialism through their readings ofThe Communist Manifestoand occasional Capital.Although these and other classical sociologists did not have access to most of Marxs published and unpublished works as we do today, each is concerned with revising and refining Marxs unfinished critique of political economy. Despite their differences with Marx and with one another, they share his concern with how empirically detailed and scientifically valid knowledge of the social world may inform historical struggles for a more human world. This commitment can be called Faustian, after the title character of the poet J. W. von Goethes tragic epic of modernity,insofar as Marx and the classical sociologists hope to translate theory into practice while making a pact or wager with the diabolical social, political, and economic forces of the modern world.

Thomas Kempleis Professor of Sociology at the University of British Columbia, Canada. His articles appear in Theory, Culture& Society, Journal of Classical Sociology, and Rethinking Marxism. He is the author of Reading Marx Writing: Melodrama, the Market, and the Grundrisse (1995), Intellectual Work and the Spirit of Capitalism: Webers Calling (2014), and Simmel (2018). 

1 Introduction: A Colossal Collection of CommoditiesMarx Contra Sociology?.- 2 Sensuously Suprasensuous Things: Capital and Social Solidarity.- 3 Capitalism as a Vocation: Capital and the Work Ethic.- 4 The Capitalists Two Souls: Capital and the Money Economy.- 5 Conclusion: Capital as Animated Monster: Sociology Contra Marxism?.